Craven v. Stone Store & Office Fixture Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Craven v. Stone Store & Office Fixture Co.

191 Ill. App. 566, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 1044

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 8, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,640

StatusPublished

This text of 191 Ill. App. 566 (Craven v. Stone Store & Office Fixture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craven v. Stone Store & Office Fixture Co., 191 Ill. App. 566, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 1044 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Sales, § 128*—what delivery not sufficient to vest title in purchaser. The delivery of goods by the seller to a forwarding company to be shipped to the purchaser does not vest title in the purchaser, where such delivery is not made in a reasonable time. 3. Sales, § 117*—when demand not necessary in action to recover hack purchase price. In an action to rescind a contract and recover the purchase price, where the goods were not delivered! in a reasonable time, no demand is prerequisite. ' 4. Contracts, § 261*—when evidence sufficient to show right to rescind. Evidence examined and held to show that plaintiff had the right to rescind and did rescind before bringing an action to recover the purchase price paid for goods.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Justice Baker

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Sales, § 128*—what delivery not sufficient to vest title in purchaser. The delivery of goods by the seller to a forwarding company to be shipped to the purchaser does not vest title in the purchaser, where such delivery is not made in a reasonable time. 3. Sales, § 117*—when demand not necessary in action to recover hack purchase price. In an action to rescind a contract and recover the purchase price, where the goods were not delivered! in a reasonable time, no demand is prerequisite. ' 4. Contracts, § 261*—when evidence sufficient to show right to rescind. Evidence examined and held to show that plaintiff had the right to rescind and did rescind before bringing an action to recover the purchase price paid for goods.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

191 Ill. App. 566, 1915 Ill. App. LEXIS 1044, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craven-v-stone-store-office-fixture-co-illappct-1915.