Craven v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Craven v. State

126 S.W. 574, 58 Tex. Crim. 460, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 159

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 9, 1910

DocketNo. 514.

StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.W. 574 (Craven v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craven v. State, 126 S.W. 574, 58 Tex. Crim. 460, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 159 (Tex. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

RAMSEY, Judge.

This appeal is prosecuted from a conviction had in the District Court of Jones County on the 30th day of July, 1909, finding appellant guilty of the crime of perjury, and assessing her punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for two years, *461 There is no statement of facts in the record as it comes to us. There is one bill of exception which relates to the ^withdrawal by the court of a special charge which had theretofore been given. Whether or not this charge was applicable to the ease and proper to be given, we can not, in the absence of statement of facts, determine, nor can we determine whether the withdrawal of same was of a nature calculated to prejudice appellant’s rights.

In the state of the record as the case reaches us, there is no question which we are authorized to review, and it is, therefore, ordered that the judgment of conviction be and the same is hereby in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

RAMSEY, Judge.

This appeal is prosecuted from a conviction had in the District Court of Jones County on the 30th day of July, 1909, finding appellant guilty of the crime of perjury, and assessing her punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for two years, *461 There is no statement of facts in the record as it comes to us. There is one bill of exception which relates to the ^withdrawal by the court of a special charge which had theretofore been given. Whether or not this charge was applicable to the ease and proper to be given, we can not, in the absence of statement of facts, determine, nor can we determine whether the withdrawal of same was of a nature calculated to prejudice appellant’s rights.

In the state of the record as the case reaches us, there is no question which we are authorized to review, and it is, therefore, ordered that the judgment of conviction be and the same is hereby in all things affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 S.W. 574, 58 Tex. Crim. 460, 1910 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craven-v-state-texcrimapp-1910.