Craven v. State

624 So. 2d 866, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10317, 1993 WL 405176
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 12, 1993
DocketNo. 92-1381
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 624 So. 2d 866 (Craven v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Craven v. State, 624 So. 2d 866, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10317, 1993 WL 405176 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from judgment and sentence for manufacture of cannabis, possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis, and possession of paraphernalia, appellant contends he was ineffectively represented at trial. He argues that this ease falls within the narrow exception to the rule that claims of ineffectiveness of counsel are collateral matters which must first be raised on motion for post-conviction relief. Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982). We disagree, and affirm without prejudice to raise the claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel in an appropriate motion for post-conviction relief.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rooney v. State
654 So. 2d 673 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 So. 2d 866, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10317, 1993 WL 405176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/craven-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.