Craven v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Craven v. State

624 So. 2d 866, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10317, 1993 WL 405176

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 12, 1993·No. No. 92-1381·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from judgment and sentence for manufacture of cannabis, possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis, and possession of paraphernalia, appellant contends he was ineffectively represented at trial. He argues that this ease falls within the narrow exception to the rule that claims of ineffectiveness of counsel are collateral matters which must first be raised on motion for post-conviction relief. Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982). We disagree, and affirm without prejudice to raise the claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel in an appropriate motion for post-conviction relief.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal from judgment and sentence for manufacture of cannabis, possession of more than 20 grams of cannabis, and possession of paraphernalia, appellant contends he was ineffectively represented at trial. He argues that this ease falls within the narrow exception to the rule that claims of ineffectiveness of counsel are collateral matters which must first be raised on motion for post-conviction relief. Stewart v. State, 420 So.2d 862 (Fla.1982). We disagree, and affirm without prejudice to raise the claim of ineffectiveness of trial counsel in an appropriate motion for post-conviction relief.

ERVIN, JOANOS and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Craven v. State, 624 So. 2d 866, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 10317, 1993 WL 405176 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

624 So. 2d 866 (Craven v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related