Craven v. City Of New York

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided August 24, 2020·No. 1:19-cv-01486·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK + ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee x

CHERYL CRAVEN, laintiff STIPULATED Plaintiff, CONFIDENTIALITY avainst- AGREEMENT AND PROTECTIVE ORDER THE CITY OF NEW YORK, AMY WEISWASSER, LAURA PARKER, and JOHN and JANE DOE (said names being fictitious, the persons intended being 19 Civ. 1486 (IMF\(OTW) those who aided and abetted the unlawful conduct of the named Defendants), Defendants. ee ee ee ee ee ee ee ee x

WHEREAS, all the parties to this action (collectively the “Parties” and individually a “Party”) request that the Court issue a protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) to protect the confidentiality of nonpublic and competitively sensitive information that they may need to disclose in connection with discovery in this action; WHEREAS, the Parties, through counsel, agree to the following terms; and WHEREAS, the Court finds good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pretrial phase of this action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that any person subject to this Order — including without limitation the Parties to this action (including their respective corporate parents, successors, and assigns), their representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this Order — will adhere to the following terms: 1. With respect to “Discovery Material” (Ze., information of any kind produced or disclosed in the course of discovery in this action) that a person has designated as

“Confidential” pursuant to this Order, no person subject to this Order may disclose such Confidential Discovery Material to anyone else except as this Order expressly permits: 2. The Party or person producing or disclosing Discovery Material (“Producing Party”) may designate as Confidential only the portion of such material that it reasonably and in good faith believes consists of: a) any information concerning any third-party in the care, custody, and control of The New York City Human _ Resources Administration/Department of Social Services (“HRA”), the City of New York (“City”), or any of its agencies; b) any information of a personal or intimate nature regarding any individual who is not a plaintiff in this action, including, but not limited to, personal information such as home addresses, telephone numbers, social security numbers, and personnel files including all information contained therein such as salary, promotions, discipline, medical information, investigations, and evaluations; c) previously non-disclosed business plans, —_ product-development information, or marketing plans; or d) any other category of information the Court subsequently affords confidential status. 3. With respect to the Confidential portion of any Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the Producing Party or its counsel may designate such portion as “Confidential” by: (a) marking “Confidential” on each page of the document or otherwise marking the Confidential portion “Confidential” in a fairly conspicuous fashion; or (b) by designating in writing the Bates-stamp numbered pages to be designated as “Confidential.”

4, A Producing Party or its counsel may designate deposition exhibits or portions of deposition transcripts as Confidential Discovery Material either by: (a) indicating on the record during the deposition that a question calls for Confidential information, in which case the reporter will mark the designated testimony it as “Confidential Information Governed by Protective Order;” or (b) notifying the reporter and all counsel of record, in writing, within 30 days after receipt of the final transcript, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript that are to be designated “Confidential,” in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript in their possession or under their control as directed by the Producing Party or that person’s counsel. During the 30-day period following a deposition, all Parties will treat the entire deposition transcript as if it had been designated Confidential. Any depositions taken in this action (where either the Confidential Discovery Material or the documents containing the Confidential Discovery Material may be disclosed or used) shall be attended only by the deponent, the deponent’s attorney, the parties, the parties’ counsel of record, and any other members of their firm and/or office (including any contractors, experts or individuals engaged by counsel in connection with performing services in this litigation), the court reporter and/or videographer. All persons attending any deposition(s) in this case shall be subject to this Order. 5. If at any time before the trial of this action a Producing Party realizes that it should have designated as Confidential some portion(s) of Discovery Material that it previously produced without limitation, the Producing Party may so designate such material by so apprising all prior recipients in writing. Thereafter, the Court and all persons subject to this Order will treat such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material as Confidential. 6. Nothing contained in this Order will be construed as: (a) a waiver by a Party or person of its right to object to any discovery request; (b) a waiver of any privilege or

protection; or (c) a ruling regarding the admissibility at trial of any document, testimony, or other evidence. This Order also does not bar the Parties from redacting from any documents produced in discovery the personal identifying information of potential, current or former employees of the City, including, but not limited to, home addresses, social security numbers, dates of birth and telephone numbers of those employees and any family members. Upon the receipt of any documents with redacted information, the non-Producing Party reserves the right to object to any redactions and the Parties shall meet and confer within five (5) business days of the objection to discuss whether the redacted information shall be disclosed. If the Parties cannot resolve the dispute, the objecting Party may file a discovery dispute in accordance with the applicable Court rules. 7. Where a Producing Party has designated Discovery Material as Confidential, other persons subject to this Order may disclose such information only to the following persons: a) the Parties to this action; b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical, or other assistant that such outside counsel employs and assigns to this matter; c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document-management consultants) that counsel hire and assign to this matter; d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that the Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto; e) as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Craven v. City Of New York, (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Craven v. City Of New York (Craven v. City Of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)