Cravatta v. New York State Department of Transportation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cravatta v. New York State Department of Transportation

77 A.D.3d 1399, 910 N.Y.S.2d 327

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 1, 2010

StatusPublished

This text of 77 A.D.3d 1399 (Cravatta v. New York State Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cravatta v. New York State Department of Transportation, 77 A.D.3d 1399, 910 N.Y.S.2d 327 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered May 15, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the petition.

[1400]*1400It is hereby ordered that the judgment insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed in its entirety.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting in part the petition seeking to annul the determination terminating petitioner Michael J. Cravatta from the position of Highway Maintenance Worker 2 by reinstating Cravatta to that position for the period of August 16, 2008 until September 22, 2008. As a condition of his employment, Cravatta was required to maintain a New York State class B commercial driver license (CDL). Cravatta was properly terminated after his CDL was suspended because he lacked one of the credentials required for his position. Cravatta’s termination was not disciplinary in nature and thus was subject to neither the arbitration clause in the collective bargaining agreement nor the provisions of Civil Service Law § 75 (see Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 14 NY3d 275, 280-282; Matter of Felix v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. Servs., 3 NY3d 498, 505-506 [2004]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Sconiers and Pine, JJ. [Prior Case History: 23 Misc 3d 1137(A), 2009 NY Slip Op 51164(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Paula L. Feroleto, J.), entered May 15, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78. The judgment, insofar as appealed from, granted in part the petition.

[1400]*1400It is hereby ordered that the judgment insofar as appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law without costs and the petition is dismissed in its entirety.

Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting in part the petition seeking to annul the determination terminating petitioner Michael J. Cravatta from the position of Highway Maintenance Worker 2 by reinstating Cravatta to that position for the period of August 16, 2008 until September 22, 2008. As a condition of his employment, Cravatta was required to maintain a New York State class B commercial driver license (CDL). Cravatta was properly terminated after his CDL was suspended because he lacked one of the credentials required for his position. Cravatta’s termination was not disciplinary in nature and thus was subject to neither the arbitration clause in the collective bargaining agreement nor the provisions of Civil Service Law § 75 (see Matter of New York State Off. of Children & Family Servs. v Lanterman, 14 NY3d 275, 280-282; Matter of Felix v New York City Dept. of Citywide Admin. Servs., 3 NY3d 498, 505-506 [2004]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra, Peradotto, Sconiers and Pine, JJ. [Prior Case History: 23 Misc 3d 1137(A), 2009 NY Slip Op 51164(U).]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

77 A.D.3d 1399, 910 N.Y.S.2d 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cravatta-v-new-york-state-department-of-transportation-nyappdiv-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack