Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/CRATTIC v. State

CRATTIC v. State

985 So. 2d 60, 2008 WL 2446669
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 19, 2008
Docket1D08-2649
StatusPublished

This text of 985 So. 2d 60 (CRATTIC v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CRATTIC v. State, 985 So. 2d 60, 2008 WL 2446669 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

985 So.2d 60 (2008)

Alonzo CRATTIC, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 1D08-2649.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

June 19, 2008.

Alonzo Crattic, pro se, Petitioner.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

DAVIS, VAN NORTWICK, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
985 So. 2d 60, 2008 WL 2446669, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crattic-v-state-fladistctapp-2008.