Cratsley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cratsley v. State

645 So. 2d 1058, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11345, 1994 WL 637700

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 16, 1994

DocketNo. 93-00407

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 645 So. 2d 1058 (Cratsley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cratsley v. State, 645 So. 2d 1058, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 11345, 1994 WL 637700 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Barry Cratsley challenges the revocation of his probation in case nos. 89-5191, 89-6111, and 90-6037. He contends that his guilty plea was not freely and voluntarily entered.

In order for the issue of the voluntariness of a plea to be considered on direct appeal, a defendant must have filed a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court. Thomas v. State, 442 So.2d 296 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983). Cratsley did not do so.

Accordingly, we affirm Cratsley’s judgments and sentences in the aforementioned cases without prejudice to his filing a motion to withdraw his plea in the trial court.

RYDER, A.C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI