Craton v. Sinclair

Supreme Court of Florida

Craton v. Sinclair

11 So. 2d 475, 152 Fla. 292, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 893

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 19, 1943

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 11 So. 2d 475 (Craton v. Sinclair) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Craton v. Sinclair, 11 So. 2d 475, 152 Fla. 292, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 893 (Fla. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

BUFORD, C. J.:

Appeal brings for review judgment of remand in habeas corpus proceedings instituted after trial and conviction.

All matters complained of should have been presented by motion to quash when amendments could have been legally made to meet objections. The information is not void.

We find no reversible error disclosed by the record and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.

So ordered.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, CHAPMAN and ADAMS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI