Craton v. Sinclair
11 So. 2d 475, 152 Fla. 292, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 893
Opinion
Appeal brings for review judgment of remand in habeas corpus proceedings instituted after trial and conviction.
All matters complained of should have been presented by motion to quash when amendments could have been legally made to meet objections. The information is not void.
We find no reversible error disclosed by the record and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.
So ordered.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Craton v. Sinclair, 11 So. 2d 475, 152 Fla. 292, 1943 Fla. LEXIS 893 (Fla. 1943).
11 So. 2d 475 (Craton v. Sinclair) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Stack v. State ex rel. LaFratta
230 So. 2d 15 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Petersen v. Mayo
65 So. 2d 48 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)