Crater v. Galaza
508 F.3d 1261, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28236, 2007 WL 4259530
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 6, 2007·No. 05-17027·Published·Cited by 16 cases
Opinions
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the petition for rehearing en banc. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on whether to rehear the case en banc. However, the en banc call failed to receive a majority of votes of the nonre-cused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing and rehearing en banc are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crater v. Galaza, 508 F.3d 1261, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 28236, 2007 WL 4259530 (9th Cir. 2007).
508 F.3d 1261 (Crater v. Galaza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Neiss v. Bludworth
D. Montana, 2022
Latray v. Bludworth
D. Montana, 2022
Hayon v. Reardon
E.D. New York, 2021
Remillard v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution
S.D. Ohio, 2021
Dickey v. Shinn
D. Arizona, 2020
Keeven Robinson v. Christian Pfeiffer
693 F. App'x 574 (Ninth Circuit, 2017)
Richard Cobb v. Rick Thaler, Director
682 F.3d 364 (Fifth Circuit, 2012)
Zaragoza v. Bennett-Haron
828 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (D. Nevada, 2011)
Miller v. Stovall
608 F.3d 913 (Sixth Circuit, 2010)
Evans v. Thompson
518 F.3d 1 (First Circuit, 2008)
Crater v. Galaza
508 F.3d 1261 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)