Crater v. Bininger
54 Barb. 155, 1869 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51
This text of 54 Barb. 155 (Crater v. Bininger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crater v. Bininger, 54 Barb. 155, 1869 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1869).
Opinion
This case cannot be distinguished in principle from Gridley v. Dole, (4 Comst. 486,) and therefore the judgment below was right, and should be affirmed, with costs,
Until Gridley v. Dole (4 N. Y. Rep. 486) be overruled, judgment must .be given for plaintiffs in cases similar to this. I concur.
Geo. G. Barnard, J., also concurred.
Judgment affirmed.
Clerke, Cardozo and Geo. G. Barnard, Justices.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gridley v. . Dole
4 N.Y. 486 (New York Court of Appeals, 1851)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
54 Barb. 155, 1869 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 51, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crater-v-bininger-nysupct-1869.