Crater Corp. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Crater Corp. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedApril 2, 2009

Docket2008-1289

StatusUnpublished

This text of Crater Corp. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc. (Crater Corp. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crater Corp. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1289

CRATER CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and AT&T COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

Robert Schultz, Schultz & Associates LLP, of Chesterfield, Missouri, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Ronald J. Eisenberg.

K. Lee Marshall, Bryan Cave LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendants- appellees. With him on the brief was Louis F. Bonacorsi.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

Judge E. Richard Webber NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1289

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

in CASE NO(S). 4:98-CV-00913

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED April 2, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1289

CRATER CORPORATION,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

LUCENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and AT&T COMPANY,

Defendants-Appellees,

and

UNITED STATES,

Defendant.

Robert Schultz, Schultz & Associates LLP, of Chesterfield, Missouri, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Ronald J. Eisenberg.

K. Lee Marshall, Bryan Cave LLP, of St. Louis, Missouri, argued for defendants- appellees. With him on the brief was Louis F. Bonacorsi.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

Judge E. Richard Webber NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2008-1289

Judgment ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

in CASE NO(S). 4:98-CV-00913

This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, SCHALL and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

DATED April 2, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Crater Corp. v. Lucent Technologies, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crater-corp-v-lucent-technologies-inc-cafc-2009.