Crapster v. Griffith

6 H. & J. 144
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedJune 15, 1823
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 H. & J. 144 (Crapster v. Griffith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crapster v. Griffith, 6 H. & J. 144 (Md. 1823).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dorsey,.. J.

The chancellor’s decree in this cause Is .erroneous, and must be reversed, as we are of opinion that the complainant is entitled to one moiety of the negroes born of Lucy and Mitty, after the execution of the comínission, and before the passing of the decree in the suit [146]*146brought by the complainant, and his wife, against the present defendant, in the court of chancery, and which is referred to, and made part of, the bill filed in this cause. And we are further of opifiiph, that the complainant is entitled to recover the value of the labour of the negroes assigned tb him; by the said decree, from the date of the auditor’s statements, to wit, the 19th December 1813, to the period when the said last mentioned negroés were tielivered to the complainant!

DECREE reversed;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clarke v. Lancaster's Lessee
36 Md. 196 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1872)
McClellan v. Crook
4 Md. Ch. 398 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1849)
Neale v. Hagthrop
3 Md. Ch. 551 (Maryland Chancery Ct, 1826)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 H. & J. 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crapster-v-griffith-md-1823.