Crapps v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Crapps v. State

498 So. 2d 415, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 620, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2934

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 26, 1986

DocketNo. 68485

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 498 So. 2d 415 (Crapps v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crapps v. State, 498 So. 2d 415, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 620, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2934 (Fla. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

BARKETT, Justice.

We have for review Crapps v. State, 483 So.2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986), because of direct and express conflict with Vicknair v. State, 483 So.2d 896 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), approved, 498 So.2d 416 (Fla.1986). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

In Crapps, the First District held that a finding of habitual offender status is an adequate reason to depart from the sentencing guidelines. Since accepting jurisdiction in this case, we have decided that this is not an appropriate reason for departure. Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986).

Accordingly, we quash that portion of the district court’s opinion which permitted a departure because of a determination of habitual offender status and remand this case to the district court with directions to remand to the trial court for resentencing in accordance with Whitehead.

It is so ordered.

MCDONALD, C.J., and ADKINS, BOYD, EHRLICH and SHAW, JJ., concur. OVERTON, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI