Crapo v. Palmer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crapo v. Palmer

187 So. 3d 953, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4696, 2016 WL 1169970

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 24, 2016

DocketNo. 1D15-3999

StatusPublished

This text of 187 So. 3d 953 (Crapo v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crapo v. Palmer, 187 So. 3d 953, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4696, 2016 WL 1169970 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Wait v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 372 So.2d 420, 424 (Fla.1979) (holding that public records exemptions are limited to those provided by statute); § 119.07(l)(e), Fla. Stat. (2014) (requiring a custodian of public records who claims an exemption to provide the basis for the exemption, “including the statutory citation to an exemption created or afforded by statute”); Tribune Co. v. Cannella, 458 So.2d 1075, 1079 (Fla.1984) (holding that “the Public Records Act has preempted the law relating to any delay in producing records for inspection” and that the only delay permitted is the “limited reasonable time” necessary for the custodian of records to retrieve the records and omit portions the custodian contends are exempt).

BILBREY and JAY, JJ., and McCALLUM, LINDA, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Wait v. Fla. Power & Light Co., 372 So.2d 420, 424 (Fla.1979) (holding that public records exemptions are limited to those provided by statute); § 119.07(l)(e), Fla. Stat. (2014) (requiring a custodian of public records who claims an exemption to provide the basis for the exemption, “including the statutory citation to an exemption created or afforded by statute”); Tribune Co. v. Cannella, 458 So.2d 1075, 1079 (Fla.1984) (holding that “the Public Records Act has preempted the law relating to any delay in producing records for inspection” and that the only delay permitted is the “limited reasonable time” necessary for the custodian of records to retrieve the records and omit portions the custodian contends are exempt).

BILBREY and JAY, JJ., and McCALLUM, LINDA, Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

187 So. 3d 953, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 4696, 2016 WL 1169970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crapo-v-palmer-fladistctapp-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack