Cranmore v. Bodine
65 Ind. 25
Opinion
In this case there was a judgment below, in favor of the appellees, against the appellant, Cranmore, and one William C. Ward, jointly.
The appellant has assigned errors in his own name only as appellant, and Ward has not been notified of the appeal, as required by the statute. 2 R. S. 1876, p. 289, sec. 551.
The appellees have suggested that, forthis reason,the appeal ought to be dismissed.
The- point is well taken, and the appeal should be dismissed.
The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
Petition'for a rehearing overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cranmore v. Bodine, 65 Ind. 25 (Ind. 1878).
65 Ind. 25 (Cranmore v. Bodine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gregory v. Smith
38 N.E. 395 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1894)
Cooper v. Peterson
34 N.E. 746 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1893)
Brown v. Trexler
30 N.E. 418 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)
Koons v. Mellett
7 L.R.A. 231 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1889)