Cranmore v. Bodine

Indiana Supreme Court

Cranmore v. Bodine

65 Ind. 25

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 15, 1878

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 65 Ind. 25 (Cranmore v. Bodine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cranmore v. Bodine, 65 Ind. 25 (Ind. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Worden, J.

In this case there was a judgment below, in favor of the appellees, against the appellant, Cranmore, and one William C. Ward, jointly.

The appellant has assigned errors in his own name only as appellant, and Ward has not been notified of the appeal, as required by the statute. 2 R. S. 1876, p. 289, sec. 551.

The appellees have suggested that, forthis reason,the appeal ought to be dismissed.

The- point is well taken, and the appeal should be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Petition'for a rehearing overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Worden, J.

In this case there was a judgment below, in favor of the appellees, against the appellant, Cranmore, and one William C. Ward, jointly.

The appellant has assigned errors in his own name only as appellant, and Ward has not been notified of the appeal, as required by the statute. 2 R. S. 1876, p. 289, sec. 551.

The appellees have suggested that, forthis reason,the appeal ought to be dismissed.

The- point is well taken, and the appeal should be dismissed.

The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.

Petition'for a rehearing overruled.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 Ind. 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cranmore-v-bodine-ind-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack