Crank, Alex Ii

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedFebruary 4, 2015
DocketWR-82,671-01
StatusPublished

This text of Crank, Alex Ii (Crank, Alex Ii) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crank, Alex Ii, (Tex. 2015).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-82,671-01

EX PARTE ALEX CRANK II, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2007CR10969-W1 IN THE 227TH DISTRICT COURT FROM BEXAR COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of murder and

sentenced to ninety-nine years’ imprisonment. The Eighth Court of Appeals affirmed the conviction.

Crank v. State, No. 08-09-00109-CR (Tex. App.—El Paso Apr. 29, 2011) (not designated for

publication).

Applicant contends that he was denied his right, through no fault of his own, to pursue a pro

se petition for discretionary review in this Court after his conviction was affirmed by the Eighth

Court of Appeals. He requests an out-of-time PDR. The trial court recommends that relief be -2-

granted, and the habeas record supports the recommendation. See Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25

(Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Riley, 193 S.W.3d 900 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006).

Applicant is entitled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time petition for discretionary review

of the judgment of the Eighth Court of Appeals in Cause No. 08-09-00109-CR that affirmed his

conviction in Cause No. 2007CR10969 from the 227th District Court of Bexar County. Applicant

shall file his petition for discretionary review with this Court within 30 days of the date on which

this Court’s mandate issues.

Applicant’s remaining claims are dismissed without prejudice. See Ex parte Torres, 943

S.W.2d 469, 474 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997).

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice-Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: February 4, 2015 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Wilson
956 S.W.2d 25 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Riley
193 S.W.3d 900 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ex Parte Torres
943 S.W.2d 469 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Crank, Alex Ii, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crank-alex-ii-texcrimapp-2015.