Cranfill v. State
This text of 189 S.W.2d 482 (Cranfill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of selling intoxicating liquors without a license.
Court adjourned on the 29th day of July; the statement of' facts was filed on the 7th day of September. This was clearly beyond the time *293 authorized by law, towit: twenty days in which to file evidence in the County Court. There are quite a number of bills of exception. These were also filed on the 7th of September and can not be considered. Without these matters before the court there is nothing to revise, and the judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
189 S.W.2d 482, 189 S.W. 482, 80 Tex. Crim. 292, 1916 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cranfill-v-state-texcrimapp-1916.