Crane v. Voorhis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crane v. Voorhis

234 A.D. 715

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D. 715 (Crane v. Voorhis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crane v. Voorhis, 234 A.D. 715 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

-— Order granting peremptory mandamus order reversed and motion denied, [716]*716without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. We are of opinion that the words “ offices to be filled ” in section 249 of chapter 270 of the Laws of 1931 include all offices to be voted for by the electors of Richmond county. The fifty per cent basis therein stated is not unreasonable or arbitrary and is not an improper exercise of legislative discretion. Young, Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-— Order granting peremptory mandamus order reversed and motion denied, [716]*716without costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. We are of opinion that the words “ offices to be filled ” in section 249 of chapter 270 of the Laws of 1931 include all offices to be voted for by the electors of Richmond county. The fifty per cent basis therein stated is not unreasonable or arbitrary and is not an improper exercise of legislative discretion. Young, Kapper, Carswell, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D. 715, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-voorhis-nyappdiv-1931.