Crane v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Crane v. State

1927 OK CR 106, 254 P. 1118, 36 Okla. Crim. 386, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 211

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 2, 1927

DocketNo. A-6393.

StatusPublished

This text of 1927 OK CR 106 (Crane v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crane v. State, 1927 OK CR 106, 254 P. 1118, 36 Okla. Crim. 386, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 211 (Okla. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, J. T. Crane, was convicted of the crime of embezzlement on an information charging that in Marshall county, March 8, 1923, he did feloniously take, convert, misappropriate, and embezzle $4,-237.66, while he was the duly elected and acting treasurer of school district No. 4 of Marshall county, to which district said money belonged. By the judgment of the court, duly pronounced, he was sentenced to be imprisoned in the state penitentiary for a term of three years and to pay a fine of $8,475.32. From the judgment he appealed. His counsel of record have filed a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal. Wherefore the motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal dismissed. Mandate forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, J. T. Crane, was convicted of the crime of embezzlement on an information charging that in Marshall county, March 8, 1923, he did feloniously take, convert, misappropriate, and embezzle $4,-237.66, while he was the duly elected and acting treasurer of school district No. 4 of Marshall county, to which district said money belonged. By the judgment of the court, duly pronounced, he was sentenced to be imprisoned in the state penitentiary for a term of three years and to pay a fine of $8,475.32. From the judgment he appealed. His counsel of record have filed a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal. Wherefore the motion to dismiss is sustained, and the appeal dismissed. Mandate forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1927 OK CR 106, 254 P. 1118, 36 Okla. Crim. 386, 1927 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 211, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-state-oklacrimapp-1927.