Crane v. State Industrial Accident Commission

Oregon Supreme Court

Crane v. State Industrial Accident Commission

383 P.2d 1020, 235 Or. 110, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 318

DecidedJuly 24, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 383 P.2d 1020 (Crane v. State Industrial Accident Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crane v. State Industrial Accident Commission, 383 P.2d 1020, 235 Or. 110, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 318 (Or. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff’s claim against the Commission is for additional compensation alleged to he caused by aggravation of compensable injuries. The Commission’s refusal to allow the claim was reviewed by a jury and sustained. Plaintiff appeals. He claims the evidence required the trial court to direct the jury to find aggravation.

It would be wasteful to set forth all of the evidence which we think required jury deliberation. Plaintiff suffered from other ailments not connected with his compensable injuries. It was for the jury to decide whether his present disability was chargeable to his other ailments or to the injuries. And also it was for the jury to find whether or not the injuries had become aggravated. The court properly refused to direct a verdict.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff’s claim against the Commission is for additional compensation alleged to he caused by aggravation of compensable injuries. The Commission’s refusal to allow the claim was reviewed by a jury and sustained. Plaintiff appeals. He claims the evidence required the trial court to direct the jury to find aggravation.

It would be wasteful to set forth all of the evidence which we think required jury deliberation. Plaintiff suffered from other ailments not connected with his compensable injuries. It was for the jury to decide whether his present disability was chargeable to his other ailments or to the injuries. And also it was for the jury to find whether or not the injuries had become aggravated. The court properly refused to direct a verdict.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

383 P.2d 1020, 235 Or. 110, 1963 Ore. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-state-industrial-accident-commission-or-1963.