Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Crane v. Schreiber

Crane v. Schreiber

114 So. 3d 235, 2013 WL 132440, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 459
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 11, 2013
DocketNo. 5D12-1598
StatusPublished

This text of 114 So. 3d 235 (Crane v. Schreiber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crane v. Schreiber, 114 So. 3d 235, 2013 WL 132440, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 459 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

See Guntner v. Jennings, 980 So.2d 1185, 1188 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008) (holding that without transcript or stipulated statement of facts, appellate court “cannot second-guess the factual basis for a forum non conveniens transfer”).

AFFIRMED.

ORFINGER, C.J., SAWAYA and COHEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Guntner v. Jennings
980 So. 2d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
114 So. 3d 235, 2013 WL 132440, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-schreiber-fladistctapp-2013.