Crane v. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co.
This text of 263 A.D. 877 (Crane v. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to set aside certain mortgage transactions as fraudulently induced, and on the ground that an underlying indebtedness has been discharged, and for certain incidental relief, respondents’ motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice was granted. Order and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 877, 33 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-scarsdale-national-bank-trust-co-nyappdiv-1942.