Crane v. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crane v. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co.

263 A.D. 877, 33 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7180

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 12, 1942·Published

Opinion

In an action to set aside certain mortgage transactions as fraudulently induced, and on the ground that an underlying indebtedness has been discharged, and for certain incidental relief, respondents’ motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice was granted. Order and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to set aside certain mortgage transactions as fraudulently induced, and on the ground that an underlying indebtedness has been discharged, and for certain incidental relief, respondents’ motion for summary judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice was granted. Order and judgment entered thereon, unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.

Crane v. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co., 263 A.D. 877, 33 N.Y.S.2d 822, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

263 A.D. 877 (Crane v. Scarsdale National Bank & Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.