Crane v. McGoldrick
This text of 243 A.D. 560 (Crane v. McGoldrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Peremptory mandamus order reversed on the law, with costs, and the petitioners’ application denied, with ten dollars costs, as a matter of law and not in the exercise of discretion. In our opinion, there is no statutory provision authorizing the employment, at public expense, of expert witnesses on behalf of a defendant under indictment for a criminal offense, in a proceeding before a lunacy commission appointed to inquire into the mental condition of the accused, and, therefore, the order of the Supreme Court made on the 9th day of February, 1934, fixing the compensation to be paid to the petitioners for their services as expert witnesses for the accused, was unauthorized. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
243 A.D. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-mcgoldrick-nyappdiv-1934.