Crane v. Long Island College Hospital

New York Court of Appeals

Crane v. Long Island College Hospital

375 N.E.2d 1231, 43 N.Y.2d 984, 404 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 1874

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 21, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 375 N.E.2d 1231 (Crane v. Long Island College Hospital) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crane v. Long Island College Hospital, 375 N.E.2d 1231, 43 N.Y.2d 984, 404 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 1874 (N.Y. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In determining whether the plaintiff established a prima facie case of negligence against the defendants, testimony offered at the trial should be considered in the light most beneficial to plaintiff, alllowing every favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn from such testimony. (Sagorsky v Malyon, 307 NY 584.) The evidence in this malpractice action, by admission and expert testimony, reveals that the injury sustained by the decedent was tourniquet paralysis of the left arm brought about by excessive pressure applied to the arm, causing an injury of the nerves. No evidence was offered by the defendants to rebut this conclusion. Since the jury could reasonably find, as it did, that the injury sustained was brought about by the defendants, while acting in concert during the course of the operation, the verdict should not have been set aside and it was, therefore, properly reinstated by the Appellate Division. (Cooke v Drigant, 289 NY 313.)

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

In determining whether the plaintiff established a prima facie case of negligence against the defendants, testimony offered at the trial should be considered in the light most beneficial to plaintiff, alllowing every favorable inference which can reasonably be drawn from such testimony. (Sagorsky v Malyon, 307 NY 584.) The evidence in this malpractice action, by admission and expert testimony, reveals that the injury sustained by the decedent was tourniquet paralysis of the left arm brought about by excessive pressure applied to the arm, causing an injury of the nerves. No evidence was offered by the defendants to rebut this conclusion. Since the jury could reasonably find, as it did, that the injury sustained was brought about by the defendants, while acting in concert during the course of the operation, the verdict should not have been set aside and it was, therefore, properly reinstated by the Appellate Division. (Cooke v Drigant, 289 NY 313.)

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 N.E.2d 1231, 43 N.Y.2d 984, 404 N.Y.S.2d 842, 1978 N.Y. LEXIS 1874, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-long-island-college-hospital-ny-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack