Crane v. Jones

Oregon Supreme Court

Crane v. Jones

33 P. 869, 24 Or. 419, 1893 Ore. LEXIS 137

CourtOregon Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 24, 1893

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 33 P. 869 (Crane v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crane v. Jones, 33 P. 869, 24 Or. 419, 1893 Ore. LEXIS 137 (Or. 1893).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The only question for decision is, whether section 16 of Hill’s Code is designed to apply to a defendant who was a non-resident of the state at the time the cause of action arose. This question was considered in McCormick v. Blanchard, 7 Or. 232, and it was there held that section 16, when considered in connection with section 26, should be construed to apply to residents only, and this is decisive of the question now presented unless that case is to be overruled, and this, as at present advised, we are not prepared to do. Judgment aepirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The only question for decision is, whether section 16 of Hill’s Code is designed to apply to a defendant who was a non-resident of the state at the time the cause of action arose. This question was considered in McCormick v. Blanchard, 7 Or. 232, and it was there held that section 16, when considered in connection with section 26, should be construed to apply to residents only, and this is decisive of the question now presented unless that case is to be overruled, and this, as at present advised, we are not prepared to do. Judgment aepirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 P. 869, 24 Or. 419, 1893 Ore. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-jones-or-1893.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack