Crane v. Gladding
This text of 59 Cal. 303 (Crane v. Gladding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from the judgment in a street assessment case, and from the order denying a motion for a new trial. The notice of intention designated that the motion would be made upon the pleadings and a statement of the case, and upon the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to justify the decision, and that the decision is against law.
But the alleged statement, as settled and filed, contained no specification of particulars in which the evidence was deemed insufficient, nor any specification of particular errors of law occurring at the trial and excepted to by the appellant; it must, therefore, be disregarded. And as the Court below found that there was no publication of the resolution of intention according to law, there is no prejudicial error in the judgment roll..
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 Cal. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-gladding-cal-1881.