Crane v. Dwyer
This text of 9 Mich. 350 (Crane v. Dwyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Equity will not lend itself to enforce a penalty or forfeiture, as it would do in giving the relief asked. The case made by the bill, is a forfeiture by one of defendants of all her rights in a contract made with complainant for the purchase of a lot of ground in the city of Detroit, and assigned to her. The house in question was built by the purchaser after he took possession of the lot; and complainant having put an end to the contract, for the non-payment of a part of the purchase money at the time stipulated, as by the terms of it he had a right to do, claims the house under the forfeiture, and asks an injunction to prevent its removal. The decree dismissing the bill must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Mich. 350, 1861 Mich. LEXIS 40, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-dwyer-mich-1861.