Crane v. Condit
Opinion
The exception to the affidavit is not -well taken. The rule requiring notice, applies to cases in which a rule to shew cause has been granted. Let the judgment be opened, but stand as security for t-he amount to be recovered.
The defendant swears to an expectation of compromise and that the entry of the judgment is a surprise. The usual practice of the Court has been followed in this case. L< t the judgment be opened, and stand as security.
As the defendant’s affidavit affects the rights of [350]*350parties, I think it should be taken upon notice; and always so, unless on a motion for a rule to shew cause.
I doubt the propriety of granting the application.
Judgment opened, to stand as security for the sum which may be recovered.
Cited in, Van Wagenen v. Halsey, 1 Harr. 351: Cooper v. Galbraith, 4 Zab. 220.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
16 N.J.L. 349 (Crane v. Condit) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.