Crane v. . Carswell
This text of 166 S.E. 746 (Crane v. . Carswell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The contributory negligence of the plaintiff bars his recovery although damages were assessed upon the third issue. Baker v. R. R., 118 N. C., 1015; Sasser v. Lumber Co., 165 N. C., 242; McKoy v. Craven, 198 N. C., 780; Allen v. Yarborough, 201 N. C., 568. We find' nothing inconsistent in the verdict and his Honor’s refusal to set it aside as a matter of discretion is not reviewable.
There is no reversible error in the instruction complained of. The ordinance referred to is practically the same as the State law. Code, 1931, sec. 2621(58).
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 S.E. 746, 203 N.C. 555, 1932 N.C. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-carswell-nc-1932.