Crane v. Buckley

Ninth Circuit

Crane v. Buckley

138 F. 22, 70 C.C.A. 452, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3760

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 8, 1905·Published

Opinion

HAWLEY, District Judge.

The only point involved in this writ of error is, “Did the defendant Buckley prosecute his appeal to effect?” This question was answered in the affirmative by this court in Buckley v. Crane, 123 Fed. 29, 33, 59 C. C. A. 109, The rulings of the court below in the trial of the present case were in accord with the views heretofore expressed by this court.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWLEY, District Judge.

The only point involved in this writ of error is, “Did the defendant Buckley prosecute his appeal to effect?” This question was answered in the affirmative by this court in Buckley v. Crane, 123 Fed. 29, 33, 59 C. C. A. 109, The rulings of the court below in the trial of the present case were in accord with the views heretofore expressed by this court.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Crane v. Buckley, 138 F. 22, 70 C.C.A. 452, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3760 (9th Cir. 1905).

Pincite

138 F. 22 (Crane v. Buckley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related