Crane v. Buckley

Ninth Circuit

Crane v. Buckley

138 F. 22, 70 C.C.A. 452, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3760

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMay 8, 1905

StatusPublished

This text of 138 F. 22 (Crane v. Buckley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crane v. Buckley, 138 F. 22, 70 C.C.A. 452, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3760 (9th Cir. 1905).

Pincite

Opinion

HAWLEY, District Judge.

The only point involved in this writ of error is, “Did the defendant Buckley prosecute his appeal to effect?” This question was answered in the affirmative by this court in Buckley v. Crane, 123 Fed. 29, 33, 59 C. C. A. 109, The rulings of the court below in the trial of the present case were in accord with the views heretofore expressed by this court.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWLEY, District Judge.

The only point involved in this writ of error is, “Did the defendant Buckley prosecute his appeal to effect?” This question was answered in the affirmative by this court in Buckley v. Crane, 123 Fed. 29, 33, 59 C. C. A. 109, The rulings of the court below in the trial of the present case were in accord with the views heretofore expressed by this court.

The judgment of the Circuit Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

138 F. 22, 70 C.C.A. 452, 1905 U.S. App. LEXIS 3760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-v-buckley-ca9-1905.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack