Crane Resistoflex v. Bailey

802 So. 2d 529, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18525, 2001 WL 1661624
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 31, 2001
DocketNo. 1D01-0242
StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 529 (Crane Resistoflex v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crane Resistoflex v. Bailey, 802 So. 2d 529, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18525, 2001 WL 1661624 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the JCC’s order but modify the order to correct a clerical error. See Belly Acres, Inc. v. Frankel, 412 So.2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (modifying final judgment for correction in computation of damages). In calculating the amount of overpayment, the JCC mistakenly used $476.36, instead of $476.86, for the period of January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997. Thus, the total overpayment is $2,090.60, resulting in a net underpayment of $13,627.56. Accordingly, we increase the amount the appellants must pay the claimant to $13,627.56, plus penalties and interest and any underpayments occurring since November 14, 2000, as awarded by the JCC.

AFFIRMED as modified.

PADOVANO, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Belly Acres, Inc. v. Frankel
412 So. 2d 48 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
802 So. 2d 529, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18525, 2001 WL 1661624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-resistoflex-v-bailey-fladistctapp-2001.