Crane Resistoflex v. Bailey
This text of 802 So. 2d 529 (Crane Resistoflex v. Bailey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the JCC’s order but modify the order to correct a clerical error. See Belly Acres, Inc. v. Frankel, 412 So.2d 48 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982) (modifying final judgment for correction in computation of damages). In calculating the amount of overpayment, the JCC mistakenly used $476.36, instead of $476.86, for the period of January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1997. Thus, the total overpayment is $2,090.60, resulting in a net underpayment of $13,627.56. Accordingly, we increase the amount the appellants must pay the claimant to $13,627.56, plus penalties and interest and any underpayments occurring since November 14, 2000, as awarded by the JCC.
AFFIRMED as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
802 So. 2d 529, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 18525, 2001 WL 1661624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-resistoflex-v-bailey-fladistctapp-2001.