Crane Company v. Joseph Hanley

Sixth Circuit

Crane Company v. Joseph Hanley

192 F.2d 1019

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 10, 1951·No. 11361_1·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court, having duly considered the briefs and arguments of the attorneys for the contending parties and the whole record in the case, thinks that the judgment awarded plaintiff by the District Court should be upheld for the reasons stated in the opinion, the amended opinion, and the opinion on motion for new trial, filed by the United States District Court; and The judgment of the District Court is, accordingly, ordered to be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court, having duly considered the briefs and arguments of the attorneys for the contending parties and the whole record in the case, thinks that the judgment awarded plaintiff by the District Court should be upheld for the reasons stated in the opinion, the amended opinion, and the opinion on motion for new trial, filed by the United States District Court; and The judgment of the District Court is, accordingly, ordered to be affirmed.

Crane Company v. Joseph Hanley, 192 F.2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

192 F.2d 1019 (Crane Company v. Joseph Hanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.