Crane Company v. Joseph Hanley

Sixth Circuit

Crane Company v. Joseph Hanley

192 F.2d 1019

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 1951

Docket11361_1

StatusPublished

This text of 192 F.2d 1019 (Crane Company v. Joseph Hanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crane Company v. Joseph Hanley, 192 F.2d 1019 (6th Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The court, having duly considered the briefs and arguments of the attorneys for the contending parties and the whole record in the case, thinks that the judgment awarded plaintiff by the District Court should be upheld for the reasons stated in the opinion, the amended opinion, and the opinion on motion for new trial, filed by the United States District Court; and The judgment of the District Court is, accordingly, ordered to be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The court, having duly considered the briefs and arguments of the attorneys for the contending parties and the whole record in the case, thinks that the judgment awarded plaintiff by the District Court should be upheld for the reasons stated in the opinion, the amended opinion, and the opinion on motion for new trial, filed by the United States District Court; and The judgment of the District Court is, accordingly, ordered to be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

192 F.2d 1019, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crane-company-v-joseph-hanley-ca6-1951.