Crandall v. Water Resources Department

626 P.2d 877, 290 Or. 771, 1981 Ore. LEXIS 717
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 31, 1981
DocketCA 12089, SC 27034
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 626 P.2d 877 (Crandall v. Water Resources Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crandall v. Water Resources Department, 626 P.2d 877, 290 Or. 771, 1981 Ore. LEXIS 717 (Or. 1981).

Opinion

*773 CAMPBELL, J.

The director of Water Resources, upon the request of the Rogue River Valley Irrigation District and the Med-ford Irrigation District, commenced this proceeding under ORS 540.610 to 540.650 to cancel a water right from Little Butte Creek for power purposes at the Daley Flour Mill, also known as the Butte Creek Mill, at Eagle Point, Oregon. The water right is for the appropriation of not to exceed 40 cubic feet of water per second, with a priority of 1872. The Daley Flour Mill is owned by Peter B. Crandall and Cora D. Crandall.

The director ordered that the right to use 15.6 cubic feet per second of the water from Little Butte Creek be cancelled. As to the remaining 24.4 cubic feet per second, the director ordered that a new water right certificate be issued with a priority subsequent to all existing rights.

The Crandalls filed a petition for judicial review under ORS 183.480 in the Court of Appeals, 1 contending that the evidence did not support the director’s finding that there had been a forfeiture of the right to use 15.6 cubic feet per second and that the director had no authority to change the priority date as to the remaining 24.4 cubic feet per second. That court affirmed that portion of the director’s order which held that 15.6 cubic feet per second was forfeited and reversed that portion which changed the priority date of the remaining 24.4 cubic feet per second. 2

The irrigation districts have petitioned this court for review, contending that the findings of fact entered by the director require the entry of a modified decree, further reducing the water right for the months of July, August and September from 24.4 to 22.0 cubic feet per second. We allowed review and affirm the Court of Appeals.

The water right for the Daley Flour Mill was adjudicated by the circuit court in a proceeding entitled In *774 the Matter of the Determination of the Relative Rights to the Use of the Waters of Little Butte Creek and its Tributaries, a tributary of the Rogue River, Jackson County, Oregon. The certificate of waiter right was issued on April 28, 1950, in the name of George Putnam for 40 cubic feet per second, with a priority date of 1872, pursuant to the circuit court’s decree entered on August 15, 1949.

Putnam bought the mill and the property on which it is located in 1933. A water-driven turbine turns a drive shaft which furnishes direct power for the mill machinery. The water for the Daley Mill is diverted from Little Butte Creek approximately 1,200 feet upstream from the turbine. The Putnams used the mill to hammer hay and feed until 1942 when they built cold storage lockers. The refrigeration compression pumps are run by the power from the turbine. In 1945 or 1946 the grindstone was rebuilt and the mill operators started grinding flour. The grain is processed, cleaned, and elevated to storage on the upper floors of the mill prior to grinding. A series of shafts and belts distribute the power from the turbine throughout the mill building. In 1972 the Putnam family sold the mill to the Crandalls.

The irrigation districts also use water from Little Butte Creek. Their water rights have a priority subsequent to 1872. The water for the irrigation districts is diverted from Little Butte Creek eight to ten miles upstream from the Daley Mill. The water available in Little Butte Creek is the lowest in the months of July, August and September. This period of time is the height of the irrigation season when the demand for water is the greatest.

The director of Water Resources held a hearing pursuant to ORS 540.641. Thereafter, he entered findings of fact and conclusions of law wherein he correctly identified the question to be decided as:

"The sole issue here is whether or not the statutory abandonment or forfeiture for failure to use the water for five successive years has or has not taken place. If it has, the right was lost at that time and the water reverted to the public. If it wasn’t, the right to the use of the water must be affirmed.”

An engineer from the Water Resources Department examined the turbine and measured its hydraulic *775 capacity while in full operation. As a result of this examination and measurement, the following finding of fact was entered:

"It is clear that 24.4 cubic feet per second is an adequate flow of water to be passed through the turbine to meet the maximum power needs of the system as installed.”

The director found that the same turbine had been used at the mill since its purchase by the Putnams and that:

"Since reconstruction of the power system by the Putnam family in the 1930’s up to the date of the hearing, the beneficial use of water has been not more than 24.4 cubic feet per second, the present maximum hydraulic capacity of the turbine with the compressors, elevators, grindstone, scourer, and scalper in operation.”

As to the flow of the water of Little Butte Creek during the critical months of July, August and September, the director found: 3

"David Hendrix, water-master for the area since 1951, testified that fluctuation was very spasmodic and would vary several cubic feet per second throughout the day when the average flow in Little Butte Creek at the Butte Creek Mill diversion was about 20 to 22 cubic feet per second. * * * Mr. Hendrix testified that, based on his 25 years experience as watermaster, measuring and distributing the waters of Little Butte Creek, the flow of Little Butte Creek at the highway bridge just below Eagle Point, would be about equal to or slightly more than the available flow at the Butte Creek Mill diversion.” (Emphasis added.)

To show the relationship of the stream flow between the diversion point at the mill in Eagle Point and the point at the highway bridge just below Eagle Point, the director entered in his findings the records of the stream flows at the highway bridge collected and maintained by the US Geological Survey showing monthly averages of the daily measurements.

*776 Year July August September

1946 14.9 cfs Í5.0 cfs 18.5 cfs

1947 19.6 cfs 18.3 cfs 18.9 cfs

.

1948 25.0 cfs 23.2 cfs 28.7 cfs

1949 19.0 cfs 20.0 cfs 24.3 cfs

1950 21.4 cfs . 24.1 cfs 27.6 cfs 4

As to the stream flow of Little Butte Creek the director also found:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hannigan v. Hinton
97 P.3d 1256 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
Rencken v. Young
711 P.2d 954 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1985)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
626 P.2d 877, 290 Or. 771, 1981 Ore. LEXIS 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crandall-v-water-resources-department-or-1981.