Crandall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Crandall v. State

268 So. 3d 275

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 2019

DocketCase No. 2D18-2721

StatusPublished

This text of 268 So. 3d 275 (Crandall v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crandall v. State, 268 So. 3d 275 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of Ms. Crandall's probation and the resultant sentence without comment. Because the written sentence contains a single designation of credit ("Credit for Time Served: 72 Days (INCLUDING PRIOR PRISON CREDIT)") without delineating the jail credit to which she is entitled from the prison credit that the trial court also awarded, we remand only for the limited purpose of the entry of a new written sentence distinguishing between the jail and prison credit awards and clarifying that the calculation of the prison credit is to be calculated by the Department of Corrections. See Rowan v. State, 779 So.2d 417, 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("This appears to be a scrivener's error that combines jail and prison credit.... The trial court need not calculate prison credit so long as the trial court checks the standard box allowing all appropriate prior prison credit.").

Affirmed; remanded.

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the revocation of Ms. Crandall's probation and the resultant sentence without comment. Because the written sentence contains a single designation of credit ("Credit for Time Served: 72 Days (INCLUDING PRIOR PRISON CREDIT)") without delineating the jail credit to which she is entitled from the prison credit that the trial court also awarded, we remand only for the limited purpose of the entry of a new written sentence distinguishing between the jail and prison credit awards and clarifying that the calculation of the prison credit is to be calculated by the Department of Corrections. See Rowan v. State, 779 So.2d 417, 418 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) ("This appears to be a scrivener's error that combines jail and prison credit.... The trial court need not calculate prison credit so long as the trial court checks the standard box allowing all appropriate prior prison credit.").

Affirmed; remanded.

SILBERMAN, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

268 So. 3d 275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crandall-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack