Crandall v. Graham

115 A. 178, 93 N.J. Eq. 675, 8 Stock. 675, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 350
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 19, 1922·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Lewis.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Swaxze, Tbenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbaci-i, White, Hebpenheimer, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Van Bus-kirk — 14. ■For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crandall v. Graham, 115 A. 178, 93 N.J. Eq. 675, 8 Stock. 675, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 350 (N.J. 1922).

115 A. 178 (Crandall v. Graham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Detwiler v. Capone
55 A.2d 380 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1947)
Volk v. Atlantic Acceptance Realty Co.
50 A.2d 488 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)
Hildinger v. Bishop
8 A.2d 813 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Celendano v. Blazejewski
129 A. 708 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)
McVoy v. Baumann
117 A. 717 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1922)