Crandall v. Gould

701 A.2d 657, 243 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 420
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 30, 1997·No. SC 15780·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 164 (AC 16103), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that under the circumstances of this case the plaintiffs had made use of a disputed right-of-way under a claim of right?

“2. Under the circumstances of this case did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had improperly found that the plaintiffs failed to prove that they had sustained irreparable harm?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crandall v. Gould, 701 A.2d 657, 243 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 420 (Colo. 1997).

701 A.2d 657 (Crandall v. Gould) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Crandall v. Gould
711 A.2d 682 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1998)