Crandall v. Gould

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Crandall v. Gould

701 A.2d 657, 243 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 420

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedSeptember 30, 1997

DocketSC 15780

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 701 A.2d 657 (Crandall v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crandall v. Gould, 701 A.2d 657, 243 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 420 (Colo. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 164 (AC 16103), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that under the circumstances of this case the plaintiffs had made use of a disputed right-of-way under a claim of right?

“2. Under the circumstances of this case did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had improperly found that the plaintiffs failed to prove that they had sustained irreparable harm?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 46 Conn. App. 164 (AC 16103), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that under the circumstances of this case the plaintiffs had made use of a disputed right-of-way under a claim of right?

“2. Under the circumstances of this case did the Appellate Court correctly conclude that the trial court had improperly found that the plaintiffs failed to prove that they had sustained irreparable harm?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

701 A.2d 657, 243 Conn. 928, 1997 Conn. LEXIS 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crandall-v-gould-conn-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack