Crandall v. Denny & Co.
This text of 2 N.J.L. 137 (Crandall v. Denny & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ON CERTIORARI.
Action brought in name of firm, error.
Various reasons were assigned for reversing the judgment of the justice; two of which were taken notice of by the court. First, that the action below was brought in the name of Francis Denny & Co. Second, that no judgment was ever rendered on the part of the referees, but execution issued without judgment. The proceedings, for these reasons, were by the court set aside, and rendered null and void.2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 N.J.L. 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crandall-v-denny-co-nj-1806.