Crandall v. Crandall

66 Pa. Super. 153, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 214
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided March 16, 1917·No. Appeal, No. 363·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The libellant and respondent were married in December, 1910, when the husband was 75 and the wife 47 years of age. After living together in apparent amity for two years, the wife left the home, and has continuously remained separated from her husband. The justification for her withdrawal from the home is the controlling question in controversy. The testimony is very conflicting, and after a careful examination of the whole record we adopt the conclusion reached by the learned trial judge, dismissing the libel for the reasons he states in his opinion.

The decree is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crandall v. Crandall, 66 Pa. Super. 153, 1917 Pa. Super. LEXIS 214 (Pa. Ct. App. 1917).

66 Pa. Super. 153 (Crandall v. Crandall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Playfair
54 Pa. D. & C. 21 (Westmoreland County Court of Quarter Sessions, 1945)
Klaus v. Klaus
24 A.2d 33 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1941)
D'Alfonso v. D'Alfonso
10 A.2d 808 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1939)
Loughney v. Loughney
169 A. 450 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1933)
Lane v. Lane
81 Pa. Super. 494 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Saville v. Saville
76 Pa. Super. 458 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)
Pomerantz v. Pomerantz
71 Pa. Super. 241 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Caldwell v. Caldwell
70 Pa. Super. 332 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1918)