Crandall v. Colley

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Crandall v. Colley

59 N.E. 844, 178 Mass. 339

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedMarch 18, 1901

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 N.E. 844 (Crandall v. Colley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crandall v. Colley, 59 N.E. 844, 178 Mass. 339 (Mass. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Holmes, C. J.

We have no way of knowing that the excess of the sum recovered in the Superior Court, over that recovered • in the Municipal Court was for interest subsequent to the judgment. The declaration was for $35 on an account annexed of seven items, amounting to $40 with a credit of $5. For all that we know the finding in the Superior Court may have allowed no interest at all. It even may have been upon different items from that in the Municipal Court. The question sought to be ’ raised is not before us.

Taxation affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holmes, C. J.

We have no way of knowing that the excess of the sum recovered in the Superior Court, over that recovered • in the Municipal Court was for interest subsequent to the judgment. The declaration was for $35 on an account annexed of seven items, amounting to $40 with a credit of $5. For all that we know the finding in the Superior Court may have allowed no interest at all. It even may have been upon different items from that in the Municipal Court. The question sought to be ’ raised is not before us.

Taxation affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 N.E. 844, 178 Mass. 339, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crandall-v-colley-mass-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack