Crandall v. Colley

59 N.E. 844, 178 Mass. 339
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided March 18, 1901·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Holmes, C. J.

We have no way of knowing that the excess of the sum recovered in the Superior Court, over that recovered • in the Municipal Court was for interest subsequent to the judgment. The declaration was for $35 on an account annexed of seven items, amounting to $40 with a credit of $5. For all that we know the finding in the Superior Court may have allowed no interest at all. It even may have been upon different items from that in the Municipal Court. The question sought to be ’ raised is not before us.

Taxation affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crandall v. Colley, 59 N.E. 844, 178 Mass. 339 (Mass. 1901).

59 N.E. 844 (Crandall v. Colley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaheen v. Hershfield
142 N.E. 761 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1924)