Crandal v. Bradley
7 Wend. 311
Opinion
The Court affirmed the judgment of the common pleas, holding on the authority of the cases of Smith v. Smith, 2 Johns. R. 235, and Pierce v. Crafts, 12 Johns. R. 90, that a note, payable in specific articles, is admissible in evidence, under the money counts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crandal v. Bradley, 7 Wend. 311 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).
7 Wend. 311 (Crandal v. Bradley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Pipes v. Norton
47 Miss. 61 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Hopper v. Eiland
21 Ala. 714 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1852)
Stewart v. Craig
3 Greene 505 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1852)
Taplin v. Packard
8 Barb. 220 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Perry v. Smith
22 Vt. 301 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1850)
Payne v. Couch
1 Greene 64 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1847)
St. Louis Floating Dock Insurance v. Soulard
8 Mo. 665 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1844)
Stever v. Lamoure
1 Hill & Den. 352 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
Carleton v. Brooks
14 N.H. 149 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1843)
Ames v. Le Rue
1 F. Cas. 759 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1840)
Wilson v. George
10 N.H. 445 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1839)