Crandal v. Bradley
7 Wend. 311
This text of 7 Wend. 311 (Crandal v. Bradley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crandal v. Bradley, 7 Wend. 311 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1831).
Opinion
The Court affirmed the judgment of the common pleas, holding on the authority of the cases of Smith v. Smith, 2 Johns. R. 235, and Pierce v. Crafts, 12 Johns. R. 90, that a note, payable in specific articles, is admissible in evidence, under the money counts.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Pipes v. Norton
47 Miss. 61 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Hopper v. Eiland
21 Ala. 714 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1852)
Stewart v. Craig
3 Greene 505 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1852)
Taplin v. Packard
8 Barb. 220 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Perry v. Smith
22 Vt. 301 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1850)
Payne v. Couch
1 Greene 64 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1847)
St. Louis Floating Dock Insurance v. Soulard
8 Mo. 665 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1844)
Stever v. Lamoure
1 Hill & Den. 352 (New York Supreme Court, 1844)
Carleton v. Brooks
14 N.H. 149 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1843)
Ames v. Le Rue
1 F. Cas. 759 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan, 1840)
Wilson v. George
10 N.H. 445 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1839)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 Wend. 311, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crandal-v-bradley-nysupct-1831.