Cramton v. Secretary of State

107 N.W. 875, 144 Mich. 341
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 24, 1906·No. Calendar Nos. 21,743 and 21,747·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The writs of mandamus in these two cases are denied, for the reason that petitions containing the requisite number of names were not presented to the secretary of State within the time prescribed by Act No. 181, Pub. Acts 1905. The language of the statute (section 2, chap. 3, of the act) is:

‘ ‘ The petition *, * * shall be delivered to said city clerk, county clerk or secretary of State at least 30 days before the second Tuesday .of June.”

This provision of the statute is mandatory. These petitions were not presented within the time, and therefore the respondent properly refused to consider them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cramton v. Secretary of State, 107 N.W. 875, 144 Mich. 341 (Mich. 1906).

107 N.W. 875 (Cramton v. Secretary of State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Smith v. Marsh
232 N.W. 99 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1930)