Cramer v. Supervisors of Sacramento
This text of 18 Cal. 384 (Cramer v. Supervisors of Sacramento) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Field, C. J. concurring.
The appeal in this case is without merit. Under the sixty-seventh section of the Consolidation Act, the President of the Board of Supervisors has no power to draw the warrant which the plaintiff seeks to obtain, unless there is money in the treasury to pay it. The petition is silent upon that subject, and is therefore insufficient to entitle the plaintiffto the relief asked. There are other grounds of objection, but it is unnecessary to notice them.
Order dismissing the proceedings affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 Cal. 384, 1861 Cal. LEXIS 203, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cramer-v-supervisors-of-sacramento-cal-1861.