Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp.

139 So. 880, 104 Fla. 399

DecidedMarch 4, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 880 (Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp., 139 So. 880, 104 Fla. 399 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Koonce,

Circuit Judge.—In this cause all the issues were resolved into a question of fact. The testimony was conflicting. The Circuit Judge heard and considered the testimony. It cannot be said that there was not evidence to support his findings, and in such cases the judgment of the lower court will not be disturbed by the appellate court. There was ample evidence to support the *400 judgment of the chancellor. Therefore the decree of the Circuit Court should be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koonce,

Circuit Judge.—In this cause all the issues were resolved into a question of fact. The testimony was conflicting. The Circuit Judge heard and considered the testimony. It cannot be said that there was not evidence to support his findings, and in such cases the judgment of the lower court will not be disturbed by the appellate court. There was ample evidence to support the *400 judgment of the chancellor. Therefore the decree of the Circuit Court should be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 So. 880, 104 Fla. 399, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cramer-v-suburban-miami-investment-corp-fla-1932.