Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp.

Supreme Court of Florida

Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp.

139 So. 880, 104 Fla. 399

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 4, 1932·Published

Opinion

Koonce,

Circuit Judge.—In this cause all the issues were resolved into a question of fact. The testimony was conflicting. The Circuit Judge heard and considered the testimony. It cannot be said that there was not evidence to support his findings, and in such cases the judgment of the lower court will not be disturbed by the appellate court. There was ample evidence to support the *400 judgment of the chancellor. Therefore the decree of the Circuit Court should be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Koonce,

Circuit Judge.—In this cause all the issues were resolved into a question of fact. The testimony was conflicting. The Circuit Judge heard and considered the testimony. It cannot be said that there was not evidence to support his findings, and in such cases the judgment of the lower court will not be disturbed by the appellate court. There was ample evidence to support the *400 judgment of the chancellor. Therefore the decree of the Circuit Court should be and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur.

Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp., 139 So. 880, 104 Fla. 399 (Fla. 1932).

Pincite

139 So. 880 (Cramer v. Suburban Miami Investment Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.