Cramer v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cramer v. State

5 So. 3d 790, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2669, 2009 WL 790157

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 27, 2009·No. 5D08-4240·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Thomas L. Cramer’s motion to correct sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In reviewing the sentencing documents, we discovered a scrivener’s error in the judgment of Cramer’s Case No. 99-2987. Although the transcript of the sentencing hearing clearly indicates that the sentence in Case No. 99-2987 was to be served consecutively to the other sentences imposed at the same time, the written judgment fails to reflect that fact. On remand, a corrected sentencing document *791 shall be prepared and a copy forwarded to the Department of Corrections.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Thomas L. Cramer’s motion to correct sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In reviewing the sentencing documents, we discovered a scrivener’s error in the judgment of Cramer’s Case No. 99-2987. Although the transcript of the sentencing hearing clearly indicates that the sentence in Case No. 99-2987 was to be served consecutively to the other sentences imposed at the same time, the written judgment fails to reflect that fact. On remand, a corrected sentencing document *791 shall be prepared and a copy forwarded to the Department of Corrections.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Cramer v. State, 5 So. 3d 790, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2669, 2009 WL 790157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

5 So. 3d 790 (Cramer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related