Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Cramer v. State

Cramer v. State

5 So. 3d 790, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2669, 2009 WL 790157
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 27, 2009
Docket5D08-4240
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 5 So. 3d 790 (Cramer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cramer v. State, 5 So. 3d 790, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2669, 2009 WL 790157 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of Thomas L. Cramer’s motion to correct sentence filed under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). In reviewing the sentencing documents, we discovered a scrivener’s error in the judgment of Cramer’s Case No. 99-2987. Although the transcript of the sentencing hearing clearly indicates that the sentence in Case No. 99-2987 was to be served consecutively to the other sentences imposed at the same time, the written judgment fails to reflect that fact. On remand, a corrected sentencing document *791 shall be prepared and a copy forwarded to the Department of Corrections.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED.

PALMER, C.J., ORFINGER and MONACO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cramer v. State
110 So. 3d 27 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
5 So. 3d 790, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 2669, 2009 WL 790157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cramer-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.