Cramer v. Maguire
This text of 1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 54 (Cramer v. Maguire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California District Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Practice Act, § 209, a party in whose favor [55]*55judgment is given may, at any time within five years after the entry thereof, issue a writ of execution for its enforcement, and after the lapse of that time (same Act, § 214) it can only issue hy leave of the Court on motion; but such leave shall not be given unless it be estabEslied, by the oath of the party or other proof, that the judgment or some part thereof remains unsatisfied and due.
In this case the five years having expired, and it being alleged that the judgment is satisfied, which plaintiff denies, an order may be entered referring the matter to James Van Hess, Esq., to take proofs and report the same, with his opinion, whether or not the judgment or any part thereof remains unsatisfied and due, and the amount thereof.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cal. Dist. Ct. 54, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cramer-v-maguire-caldistct-1857.