Cramer v. Cohn
This text of 257 A.D. 1098 (Cramer v. Cohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We disregard the convenience of six of defendants’ proposed witnesses who, according to defendants’ affidavits filed in support of the motion, will testify as experts. (Seafir v. Shutts, 190 App. Div. 518; Quinn v. Brooklyn Heights B. R. Co., 88 id. 57, 59.) The defendants have failed to establish that the convenience of a greater number of material witnesses and the ends of justice will be promoted by the change of venue sought. All concur. (The order denies a motion for change of venue. Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
257 A.D. 1098, 14 N.Y.S.2d 844, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cramer-v-cohn-nyappdiv-1939.