Cramer v. Cardio-Pulmonary Center of Bethesda, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cramer v. Cardio-Pulmonary Center of Bethesda, Inc.

706 So. 2d 330, 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1090, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 158, 1998 WL 5411

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 12, 1998·No. No. 96-596·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Diane H. Cramer brought this action before the Florida Commission on Human Relations claiming that she had been discriminated against in her employment with appellee because of a perceived handicap. Appellant’s pro se appeal is bottomed upon the introductory assertion that her brief “states the true facts of this ease.” For purposes of appellate review, however, the facts are those found by the administrative law judge and adopted by the Florida Commission on Human Relations, provided those findings are supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. The administrative law judge found no discriminatory intent on the part of appellee, and that is a factual matter. See Florida Dep’t of Community Affairs v. Bryant, 586 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Diane H. Cramer brought this action before the Florida Commission on Human Relations claiming that she had been discriminated against in her employment with appellee because of a perceived handicap. Appellant’s pro se appeal is bottomed upon the introductory assertion that her brief “states the true facts of this ease.” For purposes of appellate review, however, the facts are those found by the administrative law judge and adopted by the Florida Commission on Human Relations, provided those findings are supported by competent substantial evidence in the record. The administrative law judge found no discriminatory intent on the part of appellee, and that is a factual matter. See Florida Dep’t of Community Affairs v. Bryant, 586 So.2d 1205 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

AFFIRMED.

ERVIN, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Cramer v. Cardio-Pulmonary Center of Bethesda, Inc., 706 So. 2d 330, 7 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1090, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 158, 1998 WL 5411 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

706 So. 2d 330 (Cramer v. Cardio-Pulmonary Center of Bethesda, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related