Cramer, Carey Lee

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 2, 2011
DocketWR-74,834-01
StatusPublished

This text of Cramer, Carey Lee (Cramer, Carey Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cramer, Carey Lee, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-74,834-01

EX PARTE CAREY LEE CRAMER
, Applicant



ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. CR-1555-05-G
IN THE 370TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HIDALGO COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex.Crim.App. 1967). Applicant was charged in a nine-count indictment. He was acquitted of five counts and convicted of two counts of indecency with a child by contact, one count of indecency with a child by exposure, and one count of aggravated sexual assault of a child. He was sentenced to two years' imprisonment, probated for ten years for each indecency conviction, and was sentenced to six years' imprisonment for the sexual assault. The Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his convictions. Cramer v. State, No. 13-06-00587-CR (Tex. App.-Corpus Christi Nov. 20, 2008) (unpublished).

Applicant alleged five grounds of trial error and ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. Appellate counsel filed an affidavit responding to some of the ineffective assistance of appellate counsel allegations and the trial court made findings and conclusions. Based on this Court's independent review of the entire record, we find that applicant's attacks on his aggravated sexual assault conviction are without merit. We therefore deny relief on the grounds that attack the aggravated sexual assault conviction. The grounds attacking applicant's convictions and probated sentences for indecency with a child are dismissed without prejudice. Ex parte Hiracheta, 307 S.W.3d 323, 325 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

Filed: March 2, 2011

Do not publish



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Hiracheta
307 S.W.3d 323 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cramer, Carey Lee, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cramer-carey-lee-texcrimapp-2011.