Cram v. Springer Lithographing Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Cram v. Springer Lithographing Co.

10 Misc. 780

DecidedJuly 1, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Misc. 780 (Cram v. Springer Lithographing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cram v. Springer Lithographing Co., 10 Misc. 780 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

Ehrlich, Oh. J.

The evidence seems to bring the case within the ruling of the court in Haynes v. Aldrich, 133 N. Y. 287, and justifies the verdict rendered.

There is no evidence warranting a finding that any surrender by the landlord had been accepted.

Hence there was nothing to go to the jury.

We find no error, and the judgment appealed from must be affirmed, with costs.

Fitzsimons, J., concurs.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI