Cram v. Service Employees International Union Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
RYAN CRAM, et al.,
Plaintiffs, Civ. No. 6:20-cv-544-MK
v. ORDER
LOCAL 503 SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATION UNION, et al.,
Defendants. _____________________________
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mustafa Kasubhai filed a Findings and Recommendation (#35), and the matter is now before this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72. Although neither party filed objections, I reviewed the legal principles de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Kasubhai’s Findings and Recommendation (#35) is adopted. Defendants’ motions to dismiss (# 20, 22) are GRANTED. Plaintiffs’ claims for declaratory and injunctive relief are dismissed, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 17th of March, 2021. _______/s/ Michael J. McShane________ Michael McShane United States District Judge 1 – ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cram v. Service Employees International Union Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union (Cram v. Service Employees International Union Local 503, Oregon Public Employees Union) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.